Leonardo Marini explains how using sequential, multilayer fractional and full beam Q-switched laser technology can improve tattoo removal results.
Tattoos and body piercings have become popular among young adults in most developed countries around the world, and this trend seems to be progressively increasing1. The reasons behind the tattoo phenomenon remains a mystery, even if most tattoo bearers confirm a ‘personal’ need for individuality and identity with specific groups2. However, progressive social interactions and specific working environments may induce tattoo bearers — women more than men — to seek medical assistance to remove their tattoos. Reasons and contributing factors for tattoo removal have been recently analysed, and include fear of negative comments and improving ‘self identity’3.
Additionally, numerous studies have confirmed that tattoo pigments do not remain in the dermis. With time, they are progressively transferred to regional lymph nodes through lymphatic vessels. Ink pigments within lymph nodes might affect medical interpretations during diagnostic and surgical procedures4-5. This side-effect is not widely known but public awareness campaigns will presumably contribute to decrease tattoo procedures as well as increase tattoo removal in the near future.
Short (nanosecond) and ultra-short (picosecond) laser systems have revolutionized tattoo removal procedures since they represent the perfect technological translation of the theory of selective photo-thermolysis applied to microscopic targets6–8. Their high peak power, associated with an extremely short pulse duration, enables these laser systems to limit their destructive action to targets as small as average tattoo ink particles (40 nm), without — or minimally — affecting non-pigmented peripheral cells and tissue. Single pass Q-switched (Q-S) laser procedures, even if progressively effective, usually require an average of 8–12, and sometimes more, sessions spaced 2-3 months apart to clear tattoos. Tattoo removal with this technology requires a lot of patience from both patients and physicians9.
An interesting multilayer, full beam Q-S laser procedure (R-20) has recently been presented with the aim of reducing the total number of laser sessions10. Unfortunately, this innovative approach has been considered too complex to be routinely used in clinical practice, since 20 minute intervals between laser passes was considered excessively long. These intervals were necessary to eliminate sub-epidermal gas bubbles generated by the Q-S photo-acoustic effect, before proceeding with subsequent laser passes. Topical application of perfluorodecalin was reported useful in reducing inter-laser-pass intervals and the overall duration of the original R-20 procedure11. The author thought to ‘prime’ tattoos with a preliminary micro-ablative (2,940 nm Er:YAG or 10,600 nm CO2) fractional pass or micro-acoustic 1064 nm Q-S fractional pass before performing two or three full beam Q-S laser passes to eliminate gas bubbles through the many micro-holes created by the first pass12. The author was then able to reduce tattoo pigments by 80% after a single session and reach an almost complete pigment clearance in 4–6 sessions in the majority of tattoos treated with this technique. Picosecond laser systems claim to clear tattoo pigment faster and better than Q-S nanosecond lasers but so far, fractional multilayer Q-S procedures seem to produce quite similar results13–16.
Tattoo pigment characteristics
Professional tattoos are created by skilful tattoo artists and a variety of pigments contained in water-based tattoo inks are used to produce this popular form of body art. Presently, there are few commonly implemented rules regulating composition, distribution, storage, and practical use applied to tattoo colour formulations. In 2003 and 2008, the European Commission published specific guidelines on the chemical composition of tattoo inks17-18. These recommendations were variably implemented by different State members. Tattoo inks can be easily purchased from international manufacturers and, besides water, contain glycerine, ethanol, and sometimes preservatives. Colour particles are composed of organic and synthetic pigments and are different in size (Table 1). The smallest are the black particles and consist of carbon particles with a mean diameter ranging from 41 to 165 nm. Most of the black particles (99.94%) are less than 100 nm in size. White pigments are usually the largest and consist of TiO2. Their diameter usually ranges from 317 to 738 nm, but some inks may contain particles less than 100 nm in size. Green, blue (phthalocyanines), red and yellow (azo-pigments) particles are between black and white pigments in size19.
The biological activity of the microparticles increases as they decrease in size. Nanoparticles (NPs) are defined as particles with at least one dimension less than 100 nm. Traditionally, risk assessment of biological interactions related to NPs were performed after inhalation, ingestion, and absorption through the skin20. Carbon black pigments are produced by imperfect combustion and are available in a wide range of sizes (5–500 nm). Their perceived colour saturation is inversely proportional to aggregate size. Black inks contain high amounts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and even phenol. Both can cause complex, immunologically-mediated skin reactions21. Black carbon pigments are widely used, justifying a world production of over 10-million tonnes reported in 2005. Up to 90% of carbon black pigment is used by the rubber industry — mostly in tyres22.
Carbon black has been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as possibly carcinogenic for human beings — partly based on inhalation studies in rats22. Biological damage from carbon black and ultrafine TiO2 is supposedly linked to their inflammogenic properties, through induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS)23. TiO2 nanoparticle studies, carried out on their potential carcinogenicity, gave conflicting results, with some authors suggesting a possible genotoxicity in vivo, but with primary particle size of around 21 nm24. This particle dimension has not been found in tattoo inks so far. Azo-pigments tend to decompose into known carcinogens when exposed to light and laser irradiation25–26. Carcinogenicity studies have demonstrated a possible link with bladder cancer in humans27. In spite of all these potentially alarming findings, the safety profile of tattoo pigments seems to be very good.
Biological behaviour in the skin
Tattoo procedures are based on the meticulous intra-dermal micro-invasive introduction of pigments that will inevitably trigger a cascade of reactions aimed at eliminating and/or isolating them from the body. Once deposited in the dermis, colour micro-particles are progressively trapped into lysosomes within phagocytic dermal cells — mostly fibroblasts, macrophages, and mast cells.
Up to 32% of freshly injected tattoo pigments have been found to disappear from their original dermal injection sites 42 days after tattoo procedures in mice28. This finding is the obvious consequence of the attempt to eliminate foreign particles through the lymphatic system, bloodstream, and trans-epidermal route. Over time, the commonly observed fading of tattoos can be explained by a progressive release of colour particles by apoptotic dermal cells drained by the local lymphatic system28. Old tattoos will progressively appear as ‘ghosts’ of what they used to be when freshly made. Sometimes this lack of definition might be a sufficient motivation for tattoo removal.
Colour particle size seems to influence their local distribution within anatomical structures after their injection. Larger particles tend to remain in proximity of their initial deposition while NPs may reach the blood circulation and body organs, such as kidneys, liver, spleen, brain, and lungs. The liver and spleen are considered the main sites of NP accumulation29. In any case, once introduced in the dermis, tattoo pigments are there to stay within the body for a lifetime and can induce transient or persistent health problems related to their intrinsic chemical and physical characteristics, injection sites, and tattoo sizes30. Permanent tattoo pigment accumulation within regional lymph nodes can mimic intra-nodal calcium deposits during X-ray diagnostic procedures, making histologic examination necessary when non-benign etiologies are suspected31. Intra-operative observation of darkly pigmented tattoo-related lymph nodes could be interpreted as metastatic disease during sentinel lymph node procedures performed on melanoma patients32–36.
Laser specific interactions
Among the procedures proposed to clear tattoos, short-nanosecond and ultra-short, picosecond laser systems are presently considered the gold standard to remove tattoo pigments37–38 (Table 2). The first non-scarring removal of black tattoo pigment was reported in 1983 by Reid et al., in Scotland using a Q-switched ruby laser39 (Figure 1).
A greater understanding of laser-tissue and tattoo pigment interactions have been made since, leading to the development of innovative technical and procedural improvements40. Traumatic tattoos and tattoos complicated by allergic-reactions have been successfully cleared by pigment-blind ablative fractional lasers41–42.
Like any light source, laser wavelengths used to remove tattoo pigments have different penetration depths. Shorter wavelengths penetrate less than longer wavelengths in biologic tissue. Short- and sub-nanosecond, ultra-short lasers are able to generate a specific photo-mediated light-chromophore interaction known as the ‘photo-acoustic effect’.
A photo-acoustic effect refers to any process where absorption of optical radiation leads to the generation of sound. It is produced when extremely intense (100 million W/cm2) laser pulses are delivered in an ultra-short amount of time (billionths of a second), producing extremely high temperatures (>300°C) within specific chromophores, such as tattoo ink particles. Only high peak power laser systems are able to generate a homogeneous top-hat energy distribution on relatively larger spots allowing for a deeper penetration.
This particular kind of absorption is able to generate an abrupt, extremely confined, photo-thermal effect within selected targets, along with intrinsic chemical and ultra-structural modifications related to extremely rapid volume changes. These effects are also associated with sudden mechanical waves generated by volume expansion to the surrounding tissue (thermo-mechanical effect)43.
Tattoo particles are fractured and undergo chemical and structural changes leading to modifications of their optical properties. Intracellular water within pigment-containing cells abruptly reach boiling temperatures leading to intracellular volumetric expansion, cell membrane explosion, and subsequent release of laser-modified tattoo particles into surrounding dermal structures. Once free again, part of the fractured tattoo pigments will be ‘absorbed’ by the local lymphatic system, part will be eliminated through trans-epidermal ‘extrusion’, and part will be slowly re-phagocytosed by dermal cells explaining the variable degree of pigment persistence after each laser treatment.
It is theoretically possible to recognize three aspects of laser-induced collateral photo-acoustic tissue interaction:
- The initiation of the acoustic wave — sudden thermal expansion due to rapid energy deposition at the tissue surface by optical absorption; followed by explosive vaporization exceeding enthalpy for the phase change of water to gas; and then plasma formation due to extremely strong, non-linear optical absorption at the tissue surface caused by high-intensity laser pulses
- The propagation of the acoustic wave
- The mechanisms of injury — stress caused by the extremely steep pressure gradient of acoustic waves, and cavitation bubbles44.
Computer simulations confirmed that tattoo ink particle break-up processes are photo-mechanically mediated. Minimal collateral tissue damage is generated when proper laser parameters are used. Laser pulse duration must be shorter than the thermal diffusion time across a characteristic length, linked to particle diameter, and less than the stress confinement time of target particles. Laser energy deposition must, therefore, be both thermally and stress confined in order to physically disrupt tattoo particles45. Disruptive efficiency seems to increase with decreasing laser pulse duration46.
In spite of all these extremely interesting light-chromophore interactions, the single pass Q-switched laser technique usually requires an average of 8–12 sessions, and sometimes more, to clear tattoos. Recently introduced picosecond laser systems seem to require an average of 4–6 sessions to obtain similar results.
Laser-assisted Q-switched and picosecond laser treatments are not without risks and side-effects. They are nevertheless minimal in comparison to millisecond laser and intense pulsed light systems, which should not be used to clear tattoos47–51 (Table 3).
Laser assisted tattoo removal might be further improved by increasing trans-epidermal elimination of ink particles and optimizing lymphatic transport, both will be addressed later in the article, and by delaying or blocking post-laser treatment re-phagocytosis52.
Combined multilayer Q-switched laser procedures have been proposed to improve tattoo removal. In a study conducted by Kossida T et al., up to four subsequent laser passes were performed during the same treatment session (R-20 method). Twenty-minute inter-pass intervals were considered necessary to allow cavitation bubbles escaping through epidermal layers10. This innovative treatment, even if quite difficult to reproduce in clinical practice due to its complexity, was able to significantly reduce the number of sessions necessary to clear tattoos with minimal, transient side-effects. Topical application of perfluorodecalin has been proposed to clear post-QS laser epidermal whitening. A few seconds was reported to be sufficient in order to clear sub-epidermal cavitation bubbles, significantly decreasing the overall R-20 procedure treatment time11.
Tattoo removal with ablative fractional laser systems
Modern ablative laser technologies and pulse energy modulation have revolutionized operator control on photo-thermal vaporization of biological tissue using 2940 nm Er:YAG and 10,600 nm CO2 laser systems53–58. Recently, micro-ablative fractional technology was also successfully associated with Q-switched laser tattoo removal, opening new horizons in skin rejuvenation procedures59.
Ablative fractional laser technology (AFLT) has been successfully used in tattoo removal procedures, either alone or in combination with Q-switched laser systems. (Figure 2) Micro-surgical laser ablation of thin, vertical skin columns has proven effective in removing portions of tattoo pigments through direct destruction and external elimination of microscopic necrotic debris (MEND). 2940 nm Er:YAG and 10,600 nm CO2 ablative tattoo removal does not modify the chemical-physical structure of tattoo pigments since both systems operate within millisecond pulse ranges. Residual ink particles are partly re-phagocytised by dermal fibroblasts and partly drained by the local lymphatic system39–40. This particular laser approach will significantly decrease the overall quantity of potentially dangerous tattoo particles through trans-epidermal elimination.
High energy fractional-mode 1064 nm Q-S laser systems can produce a relative colour-blinded, controlled tissue ablation through a combined mechanism of micro-thermal and photo-acoustic effects. This unique approach has the potential for generating a photo-mechanical disruption of ink particles, associated with a significant trans-epidermal elimination of pigments12 (Figure 3). Two of the three main points proposed to improve the efficiency of laser-assisted tattoo removal: increasing trans-epidermal elimination of ink particles, and optimizing lymphatic transport, will therefore be implemented52.
Ablative fractional laser technology (AFLT) has also been successfully used to improve the cosmetic and functional aspects of scars60–62.
Cosmetic tattoos can sometimes be associated with perceptible textural skin changes due to a variable degree of scarring produced by the mechanical perforations of dermal layers during the initial transfer of tattoo ink into the skin. These thin, irregular scar layers are responsible for increased light diffraction during laser treatments, negatively influencing the overall efficiency when using picosecond and Q-switched nanosecond non-ablative mode lasers. Lasers using ablative fractional technology (AFT) are not affected by dermal scarring when considering their overall efficiency in destroying tattoo pigments. They can also contribute to improve the textural quality of tattooed skin through progressive dermal remodeling41–42.
Innovative combined laser-assisted tattoo treatments
In an attempt to optimize tattoo removal procedures, new innovative laser strategies have recently been proposed with variable degrees of clinical success. As in many other fields of modern laser dermatology, sequential combinations of multiple laser passes have demonstrated better clinical results than single technologies used alone63–65. Focusing our attention on time-honoured Q-switched lasers, it has been demonstrated that multiple sequential passes, performed during the same tattoo removal session, were able to enormously enhance the efficiency of intra-dermal pigment clearing, without increasing complications and side-effects10. Sequentially combining 2940 nm Er:YAG or 10,600 nm CO2 ablative fractional resurfacing with full beam Q-switched lasers has proven more efficient than each laser technique used alone12,41,52,65.
The author was able to obtain similarly good tattoo clearing responses after a single laser session combining an ablative 2940 nm Er:YAG laser fractional resurfacing (AFR) using a SP Dynamis platform (Fotona, Slovenia), with two/three full top-hat beam, high peak energy Q-switched laser passes performed with a QX Max laser unit (Fotona, Slovenia) (Figure 4–5). Five-minute intervals between laser passes were considered sufficient to stop capillary bleeding.
Laser-assisted tattoo removal is not a painless procedure, particularly when larger anatomical areas and multiple passes are considered. Therefore, the author administered subdermal local anaesthesia to all treated tattoo sites (1% mepivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine). Epinephrine was chosen to induce a temporary vasoconstriction able to reduce unnecessary light absorption by haemoglobin during the laser procedure. Besides laser proof goggles, a suitable form of ear protection is also required, since the Q-switched photoacoustic effect generates a high pitch noise during operation.
All treated sites followed a three-step dressing strategy aimed at providing a suitable environment to optimise wound healing. Immediately after each laser procedure, and during the full duration of the acute inflammatory healing phase, all treated tattoo sites were covered with sterile paraffin impregnated gauze and a thin layer of a hydro-active colloid alginate dressing formulation (Flaminal Forte, Flen-Pharma, Belgium), with excellent hygroscopic and anti-microbial properties. This specific medical device enhances trans-epidermal ‘extraction’ of tattoo micro-particles freed by laser procedures, while creating a hostile environment to microorganisms.
A final cover was provided by a sterile absorbing pad and TNT gauze. Class 1 compression stockings were prescribed for tattoos located on the lower extremities in order to help lymphatic drainage. Patients were instructed to remove their compression stocking at night.
Detailed written instructions were provided to standardize dressing procedures at home. The dressing sequence was performed 2–3 times per day, during the first 3–5 days post-treatment, or until trans-epidermal oozing stopped.
The second dressing stage, designed to assist the proliferating phase of wound healing, consisted of a topical application of sterile silicone gel (Stratamed, Switzerland) to provide a full contact, surface-conforming, semi-permeable transparent film, able to protect the newly formed epidermis from dehydration and potential micro-environmental irritations. Once dried, the thin silicone film was covered by a ultra-thin hydrocolloid pad to further protect treated areas by involuntary mechanical trauma. This dressing sequence was performed once a day until a uniform, perfectly flat pinkish epidermis was observed. Distally located tattoos on limbs required longer healing time and patients were preliminary informed.
The last dressing sequence was studied to optimise the early remodelling phase of wound healing and consisted of a topical application of a super-potent, class 1, steroid (0.05% clobetasol propionate) to be continued twice a day for 2–3 consecutive days per week — with the purpose of controlling excessive localized neo-angiogenesis. Pulsed steroid treatment continued for one/two months. A topical wound remodelling cream (i.e. Cicalfate-Avene, France, or Cicaplast baume B5-La Roche Posay, France) was prescribed to be liberally applied — a minimum of 2–3 times a day — during the same dressing phase and until the next laser session.
The author is very keen on the post-tattoo laser treatment dressing sequence since tattoo sites require multiple laser sessions to be cleared. Dermal-epidermal tissue needs to fully recover before planning subsequent laser treatments in order to tolerate repetitive micro-wounding and the subsequent inflammatory response. Up to 90% of treated tattoos (20 cases) demonstrated almost complete pigment clearing after 5 sessions.
After these encouraging results the author wanted to try a new sequential multilayer tattoo removal technique using a Q-switched laser unit able to deliver its laser beam both in fractional and full beam mode (QX Max, Fotona, Slovenia). Local anaesthesia, optical and acoustic protection, and the post-treatment dressing sequence were the same as the previous treatment protocol.
Preliminary ‘fractional priming’ was performed with a fractional Q-switched handpiece, able to generate twenty-five 250-μm micro-spots within an area of 5 mm x 5 mm. A 1,064 nm Nd:YAG wavelength was selected because of its deeper optical penetration. High energies, up to 12.7J/cm2, and stacking pulses, between 6–10, were used to completely cover all tattoo areas. Capillary bleeding was observed from each photo-acoustic micro-ablative spot, confirming the author was able to reach the papillary and upper reticular dermis (Figures 6–7). Five-minute intervals were sufficient to stop capillary bleeding, allowing the following full beam laser passes to be safely and efficiently performed. The same successful clearing rate was observed after the first laser sessions in the majority of tattoos (up to 80%). Up to 90% of treated tattoos (20 cases) showed an almost complete pigment clearing after 4 sessions (Figure 8). Interestingly, the author was able to improve both skin colour and textural irregularities of difficult-to-treat resistant tattoos, after up to 16 previously performed laser treatments.
Patient compliance and satisfaction levels were extremely high, due to the important pigment reduction observed after the first laser treatment, a painless procedure, and standardized dressing sequence.
Laser-assisted tattoo removal is gaining momentum in the complex scenario of modern dermatologic laser applications. The increasing number of tattoo bearers seeking medical advice to eliminate recent and old tattoos has prompted dermatologists and laser researchers to come up with new, innovative treatment strategies and techniques. Presently, time-honoured short-pulse Q-switched lasers seem to withstand the challenge posed by the new generation of picosecond laser systems when used as part of innovative sequential combinations. Much has been discovered about the potential hazards linked to chemical and ultra-structural characteristics of tattoo pigments, and more needs to be studied. Even if tattoo ink particles remain in the body for life, techniques able to eliminate them, even partially, through the skin could reduce their potential biological hazards. Combination treatments with conventional millisecond and recently introduced Q-switched fractional laser systems as well as short- (nanosecond) and ultra-short (picosecond) full beam laser systems seem to be a winning combination to rapidly and effectively clear intra-dermal tattoo pigments increasing both their external elimination and internal redistribution within the lymphatic system.
Declaration of interest The author declares no potential conflicts of interest
Figure 1–8 © Dr Marini
- Laumann AE, Derick AJ. Tattoos and body piercing in the United State: a national data set. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 55:413-21
- Kazandjieva J. Tattoos and piercing. Clin Dermatol. 2007; 25:361
- Armostrong ML, Roberts AE, Koch JR, et al. Motivation for contemporary tattoo removal. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(7):879-884
- Adwani CMJ, Krishnan H. Tattoo pigment in an axillary lymph node simulating metastatic malignant melanoma. Intern Sem Surg Oncol. 2005; 2:28-30
- Yactor AR, Michell MN, Koch MS, et al. Percutaneous tattoo pigment calcific deposits in axillary lymph nodes Proc(Bayl Univ Med Cent).2013; 26(1):28-29
- Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorbtion of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983; 220(4596):524-527
- Choudhary S, Elsaie ML, Leiva A. Lasers for tattoo removal: a review Lasers Med Sci. 2010; 25:619-627
- Kent KM, Graber EM. Laser tattoo removal: a review. Dermatol Surg. 2012; 38:1-13
- Kirby W, Desai A, DesaiT, et al. The Kirby-Deasi scale : a proposed scale to assess tattoo-removal treatments J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2009; 2(3):32-37
- Kossida T, Rigopoulos D, Katzambas A, et al. Optimal tattoo removal in a single laser session based on the method of repeated exposures. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012; 66:271-7
- Reddy KK, Brauer JA, Anolik R., et al. Topical perfluorodecalin resolves immediate shitening reactions and allow rapid effective multiple pass treatment of tattoos. Lasers Surg Med. 2013; 45:76-80
- Marini L, Crisman G. Fractional priming + Q-switched sequential layering tattoo removal. Lasers Surg Med. 2013; 45(S25): 9
- Ross EV, Naseef G, Lin C, et al. Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched nedimium:YAG lasers. Arch Dermatol. 1998; 134:167-171
- Brauer JA, Reddy KK, Anolik R, et al. Successful and rapid treatment of blue and green tattoo pigment with a novel picosecond laser. Arch Dermatol. 2014; 148:820-823
- Saedi N, Metelitsa A, Petrell K, et al. Treatment of tattoos with a picosecond alexandrite laser – A prospective trial. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148(12):1360-1363
- Bernstein EF, Schomacker KT, Basilavecchio LD, et al. A novel dual-wavelenght Nd:YAG picosecond-domain laser safely and effectively removes multicolour tattoos. Lasers Surg Med. 2015; 47:542-548
- Council of Europe Commission. Resolution ResAP(2003)2 on tattoos and permanent make-up. 2003. Available at: http://wcd.coe.int/wcd/ ViewDoc.jsp?id=45869
- Council of Europe. Resolution ResAP(2008)1 on requirements and criteria for the safety of tattoos and permanent make-up. 2008. Available at: http://www.coe.int/t/e/social_cohesion/soc-sp/ResAP_2008_1%20E.pdf
- Hogsberg T, Loeschner K, Loft D, and al. Tattoo inks in general usage contain nanoparticles. Br J Dermatol. 2011; 165:1210-1218
- Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113:823-939
- Lehner K, Santarelli F, Vasold R, et al. Black tattoo inks are a source of problematic substances such as dibuthyl phthalate. Contact Dermatitis 2011; 65:231-238
- Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, et al. Carcinogenicity of carbon black, titanium dioxide, and talc. Lancet 2006; 7: 295-6
- Jacobsen NR, White PA, Gingerich J, et al. Mutation spectrum in FE1-MUTA (TM) mouse lung epithelial cells exposed to nanoparticulate carbon black. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011; 52:331-7
- Trouiller B, Reliene R, Westbrook A, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce DNA damage and genetic instability in vivo in mice. Cancer Res 2009; 69:8784-9
- Jamec GB. Vomment on: tattooing of skin results in transportation and light-induced decomposition of tattoo pigments. Exp Dermatol. 2010; 19:61-2
- Cui Y, Spann AP, Couch LH, et al. Photodecomposition of pigment yellow 74, a pigment used in tattoo inks. Photochem Photobiol. 2004; 80:175-84
- Golka K, Kopps S, Myslak ZW. Carcinogenicity of azo colorants: influence of solubility and bioavailability. Toxicol Lett. 2004; 151: 203-10
- Engel E, Vasold R, Santarellu F, et al. Tattooing of skin results in transportation and light-induced decomposition of tattoo pigments – a first quantification in vivo using a mouse model. Exp Dermatolol. 2010; 19:54-60
- Tang J, Xiong L, Wang S, et al. Distribution, translocation and accumulation of silver nanoparticles in rats. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2009; 9:4924-32
- Klugl I, Hiller KA, Landthaler M, et al. Incidence of health problems associated with tattooed skin: A nation-wide survey in German-speaking countries. Dermatology 2010; 221:43-50
- Yactor AR, Mitchell MN, Koch MS, et al. Percutaneous tattoo pigment simulating calcific deposits in axillary lymph nodes. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cen). 2013; 26(1):28-29
- Jack CM, Adwani A, Krishnan H. Tattoo pigment in an axillary lymph node simulating metastatic malignant melanoma. Int Sem Surg Oncol. 2005; 2:28-30
- Peterson SL, Lee LA, Ozer K, et. al. Tattoo pigment interpreted as lymph node metastasis in a case of subungual melanoma. Hand 2008;3:282-285
- Bordea C, Latifaj B, Jaffe W. Delayed presentation of tattoo lympadenopathy mimicking malignant melanoma lymphadenopathy. J Plast Reconst Aest Surg. 2009; 62:e283-e285
- Kurle S, Schulte KW, Homey B. Akkumulation von tatoo-pigment im sentinellymphnoten. Hautartz 2009; 60:781-783
- Balasubramanian I, Burke JP, Condon E. Painful pigmented lymphadenopathy secondary to decorative tattooing. Am J Emerg Med. 2013; 31:1001e1-1001.e2
- Burris K, Kim K. Tattoo removal. Clin Dermatol. 2007; 25:388-392)
- Kent KM, Graber EM. Laser tattoo removal: A review. Dermatol Surg. 2012; 38: 1-13
- Reid WH, McLeod PJ, Ritchie A, et al. Q-switched ruby laser treatment of black tattoos. Br J Plast Surg. 1983; 36:455-459
- Luebberding S, Alexiades-Armenakas M. New tattoo approaches in dermatology. Dermatol Clin. 2014; 32:91-96)
- Ibrahimi OA, Zain S, Sakamoto FH, et al. Treatment of tattoo allergy with ablative fractional resurfacing: A novel paradigm for tattoo removal. J Amer Acad Dermatol. 2011; 64:1111-1114
- Seitz AT, Grunewald S, Wagner JA, et al. Fractional CO2 laser is as affective as Q-switched ruby laser for the initial treatment of a traumatic tattoo. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014; 16:303-305
- Park HJ, Wu B, Diebold GJ. Effects of exothermic chemical reaction on the photoacoustic effect from particulate suspensions. J Chem Physic. 2011; 134:124513
- Watanabe S, Flotte TJ, McAuliffe DJ, et al. Putative photoacoustic damage in skin induced by pulsed ArF excimer laser. J Invest Dermatol. 1988; 90:761-766
- Ho DDM, London R, Zimmerman GB, et al. Laser tattoo removal: a study of the mechanism and optimal treatment strategy via computer simulations. Laser Surg Med. 2002; 30:389-397
- Ross EV, Naseef GS, Lin CP, et al. Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium:YAG lasers. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:167-171
- Wenzel S, Landthaler M, Baumler W. Recurring mistakes in tattoo removal. Dermatology 2009; 218.164-167
- England RW, Vogel P, Hagan L. Immediate cutaneous hypersensitivity after treatment of tattoo with Nd:YAG laser: A case report and review of the literature. Ann Allergy Astma Immunol. 2002; 89:215-217
- Izikson L, Avram M, Anderson RR. Transient immunoreactivity after laser tattoo removal: report of two cases. Lasers Surg Med.. 2008; 40:231-232
- Varma S, Swanson NA, Lee KK. Tattoo ink darkening of a yellow tattoo after Q-Switched laser treatment. Clin Exper Dermatol. 2002; 27:461-463
- Bernstein EF. A widespread allergic reaction to black tattoo ink caused by laser treatment. Laser Surg Med. 2015; 47:180-182
- Anderson RR. Regarding tattoos: Is that sunlight, or oncoming train at the end of the tunnel? Arch Dermatol. 2001; 137:210-212
- Manstein D, Herron SG, Sink KR, et al. Fractional photothermolysis: A new concept for cutaneous remodelling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Laser Surg Med 2004; 34:426-38
- Cohen SR, Hessler C, Johnston J. Fractional photothermolysis for skin rejuvenation. J Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124:281-90
- Saedi N, Petelin A, Zachary C. Fractionation: A new era in laser resurfacing. Clin Plastic Surg 2011; 38:449-461
- Dierickx CC, Khatri KA, Tannous ZS, et al. Micro-fractional ablative skin resurfacing with two novel erbium laser systems. Laser Surg Med 2008; 40: 113-23
- Regan TD, Uebelhoer NS, Sattler E, et al. Depth of tissue ablation and residual thermal damage caused by a pixellated 2,940nm laser swine skin model. Laser Surg Med 2010; 42:408-11
- Bonan P, Campolmi P, Cannarozzo G, et al. Eyelid skin tightening: a novel “niche” for fractional CO2 rejuvenation. J Eur Acad Dermatol 2011; DOI:10.1111/j.1468-3083-2011.04034.x
- Gold MH, Sensing W, Biron J. Fractional Q-switched 1,064-nm laser for the treatment of photoaged-photodamaged skin. J Cosm Laser Ther. 2014; 16:69-76
- Kunishige JH, Katz TM, Goldberg LH, et al. Fractional photothermolysis for the treatment of surgical scars. Dermatol Surg. 2010; 36:538-541
- Khatri KA, Mahoney DL, McCartney MJ. Laser scar revision: A review. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011; 13:54-62
- Manuskiatti W, Iamphonrat T, Wanitphakdeedecha R, et al. Comparison of fractional erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet and carbon dioxide lasers in resurfacing of atrophic acne scars. Dermatol Surg. 2013; 39:111-120
- Trelles MA, Allones I, Velez M, et al. Nd:YAG laser combined with IPL treatment improbe clinical results in non-ablative photorejuvenation. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004; 6:69-78
- Alexiades-Armenakas M. Rhytides, laxity, and photoaging treated with a combination of radiofrequency, diode laser, and pulsed light and assessed with a comprehensive grading scale. J Drug Dermatol. 2006; 5(8):731-738
- Weiss ET, Geronemus RG. Combining fractional resurfacing and Q-switched ruby laser for tattoo removal. Dermatol Surg. 2010; 36:1-3